Evidence in five places
CCTV requests in email, body-worn footage on a drive, statements in Word, letters in a shared folder, incidents in a spreadsheet. The chronology lives in one officer's head.
Anti-social behaviour rarely makes the headlines, but it decides whether people come back. Street drinking, intimidation, begging, groups outside the shops, damage and noise: individually minor, collectively corrosive.
Authorities do not lack effort. They lack a consistent method and a single record of what has already been done.
CCTV requests in email, body-worn footage on a drive, statements in Word, letters in a shared folder, incidents in a spreadsheet. The chronology lives in one officer's head.
A warning letter is sent; months pass; nothing follows. By the time legal action is considered, the evidence is stale and the file has to be rebuilt.
Businesses and residents report the same behaviour repeatedly and hear nothing back. Reporting falls — not because things improved, but because people gave up.
Without week-by-week demand by place, councils cannot show partners or the public that the money and effort changed anything.
One experienced officer can transform a town centre. When they move on, the knowledge leaves with them.
Missing signed copies, wrong exhibit numbers and undocumented service can undo months of work at the hearing.
“The behaviour is the same in every town. The difference is whether someone follows it through — every single week.”SecureCase founder, former frontline ASB lead